Skip to content
Greta.Agency

Learn What the Best Products
Got Wrong — And How to Fix It for SaaS

Opinionated, specific critiques of how great products could be better — the UX improvements, architectural refactors, and product decisions we'd make differently.

For SaaS companies: Converting trial users to paid while reducing churn in a competitive market.

Read Critiques

Industry

SaaS

B2B software products with subscription revenue and multi-team adoption

Core Challenge

Converting trial users to paid while reducing churn in a competitive market

Target Outcome

scalable MRR with strong NRR and low CAC

The Problem

What SaaS teams miss when studying what we'd do differently

B2B software products with subscription revenue and multi-team adoption — compounded by converting trial users to paid while reducing churn in a competitive market.

01

Learning only from success stories without understanding why good products still have flaws

02

No framework for structured product critique that produces actionable improvements

03

Cargo-culting decisions from successful products without understanding their limitations

04

No way to develop product taste without seeing both what works and what doesn't

How Greta Helps

What We'd Do Differently applied to SaaS products

We give honest, specific critiques — not generic praise or vague suggestions

We explain exactly what we'd change and why — with the product thinking behind each decision

We use real products to develop the product taste that separates good from great

We show how the same problem was solved better elsewhere

Outcomes

What SaaS founders gain from what we'd do differently

Sharper Product Taste

Learning to see flaws in great products develops the taste that makes your own decisions better.

Constructive Critique Framework

A structured way to evaluate any product — your own or a competitor's.

Avoid Repeated Mistakes

Learn from documented errors before you build the same anti-patterns.

Better Design Vocabulary

Specific critiques build the vocabulary for describing design decisions precisely.

How It Works

The what we'd do differently process for SaaS products

01

Define what the product is trying to do

Every critique starts with understanding the intended goal — before judging the execution.

02

Identify where it falls short

Find the specific moments where the product makes the user work harder than it should.

03

Propose the alternative

Describe the specific change — not just 'make it simpler' but exactly what simpler looks like.

04

Evaluate the trade-off

Acknowledge why the current design might have been chosen — and why the alternative is better.

Use Case

What We'd Do Differently for SaaS

SaaS companies operate within specific constraints: B2B software products with subscription revenue and multi-team adoption. Understanding what we'd do differently through this lens leads to scalable MRR with strong NRR and low CAC.

Without rigorous what we'd do differently

  • ×Learning only from success stories without understanding why good products still have flaws
  • ×No framework for structured product critique that produces actionable improvements
  • ×Cargo-culting decisions from successful products without understanding their limitations

With Greta's what we'd do differently approach

  • We give honest, specific critiques — not generic praise or vague suggestions
  • We explain exactly what we'd change and why — with the product thinking behind each decision
  • We use real products to develop the product taste that separates good from great
What We'd Do Differently for SaaS

Learn from the best.
Build for SaaS companies.

Greta applies the patterns from great products to build yours — shipped in days, not months.